
David Thewlis, had he played but one part in his career - that of “Johnny” in Mike Leigh’s Naked (above) - would surely still be remembered through the ages as one of the finest film actors of the 1990s. Fortunately, his twenty-plus year experience as a thespian has yielded dozens of roles for viewers to appreicate, all as finely rendered if not necessarily as durative or profound as his infamously scabrous performance in that film. Working with directors as well-regarded and varied (or in some instances at the nadir of their craft) as Alan Clarke, Paul Greengrass, Louis Malle, Agnieszka Holland, Henry Selick, John Frankenheimer, Joel Coen, Bernardo Bertolucci, Alfonso Cuaron, Ridley Scott and Terrence Malick, in projects both brilliant and ill-fated (The Island of Dr. Moreau? Hello?) Thewlis seems interested in occupying interesting characters, however brief or unlikeable their manifestations on screen. Among his film and TV appearances:
- The Singing Detective (’86)
- Life Is Sweet
- Naked
- Prime Suspect 3
- Total Eclipse
- Restoration
- James and the Giant Peach
- American Perfekt
- Seven Years in Tibet
- The Big Lebowski
- Besieged
- Gangster No. 1
- Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
- Kingdom of Heaven
- The New World
If you must choose just one to watch, let it be Naked — it’s a nearly perfect film with a central character as diamond black and as ferociously knowing as A Clockwork Orange’s “Alex,” requiring Thewlis to be as poetically articulate as any Shakespearean protagonist, as verbosely witty and erudite as any of Woody Allen’s urbanites, and as craftily venemous as a young Jack Nicholson. Some have called it one of the most depressing films ever made; I find it endlessing invigorating in its clear-eyed, hilarious and ultimately tender observation of the broken, displaced and unwanted (many more of us than is readily admitted).
There is a twenty-minute segment at the film’s middle that is, by itself, one of the best written pieces cinema of the last quarter century. Johnny, homeless and wandering, is let inside an empty office building by a sympathetic nightwatchman. What begins as a wary, inarticulate respect between the two is eventually ratcheted up to lacerating, Mamet-esque back-and-forth about duty, ambition, family, education, economics, politics, conspiracy and ultimately Our Place In The Universe and the true nature of the Cosmos — all without an ounce of pretension or condescension from the filmmaker or actors. I’ve watched this bit of the film a dozen times, and can’t imagine anyone wanting to be an actor - or a human being - without having seen and studied it as often.