I watched two new farces — both of which hit DVD today — the French The Valet and Lars von Trier’s The Boss of it All.

The Valet is your standard French farce — it’s a light and frothy confection without reason to mull it over afterward. In it, a billionaire CEO hires a hapless valet to pose as the boyfriend of the CEO’s supermodel mistress in order to trick the CEO’s wife into thinking that there’s actually nothing going on between the CEO and the supermodel.
The valet and his slacker roommate will almost certainly be played by Michael Cera and Jonah Hill, respectively, in the American remake (which I just made up). Mostly, I watched it because I’m a fan of Daniel Auteuil (here playing the CEO), who always looks like a big, confused bird to me, whether he’s doing comedy (like this or, say, The Closet) or drama (like Cache).
—
The Boss of it All is pretty funny (in a deadpan sort of way), which is a bit of a surprise coming from the director of Dancer in the Dark and Breaking the Waves. A tech firm owner wants to be beloved by his employees, so he invents a fictional boss to blame bad news on. When an Icelandic firm wants to buy the company, he’s forced to hire an out-of-work actor to portray the fictional “boss of it all.” Hijinks, inevitably, ensue.

I’m more interested in Lars von Trier’s working methods than his actual movies, most of the time. I like his ideas about forcing limitations on art (on excellent display in his tongue-in-cheek Dogma manifesto). My favorite of his films, not coincidentally, is The Five Obstructions, a documentary in which von Trier challenges fellow filmmaker Jørgen Leth to remake his own short film five times, with a different set of “obstructions” each time. It’s fascinating to watch von Trier’s manipulativeness — for which he’s well known — give way to an expression of love and respect, free of the distancing techniques he commonly employs.
In The Boss of it All, von Trier introduces the Automavision process, a distancing technique if there ever was one. This process allows a computer to decide how to tilt or pan the camera. The camera then holds still, they shoot a take, and the camera resets and they do it again. The resulting film, then, is filled with jump cuts between various oddly-framed shots.
It’s is an exercise in deliberate obfuscation, totally at odds with the content. I’m not sure that it does the movie any favors, honestly, but it’s obviously what von Trier wants — he further distances both the audience and himself from the movie by introducing it and apologizing for making a movie that’s “not worth a moment’s reflection.” I’ll admit, I’ve spent more time since thinking about the Automavision than about the actual plot — maybe that was von Trier’s plan all along.