“whew…wow…uh…huh?”
That’s really all I had to say after watching Southland Tales, the latest film from Richard Kelly, who gained notoriety for Donnie Darko in 2001. When the buzz of Southland Tales hit the newswire a couple of years ago, the task was ambitious to say the least. Tied into 3 graphic novel prequels, and a completely immersive internet campaign, Southland Tales was set up to be one of the most sought out films of that year. When it debuted at Sundance, it received some of the worst of reviews in the entire festival. Kelly would have to re-edit the entire thing, start from the beginning. That was in 2006. Here we are in 2008, finally able to see what all the fuss was about.

As minimally as I can describe, Southland Tales is essentially about the alleged “end of days” that is imminent after America becomes a police state under an uber-Patriot Act to fight the “war on terror” after being bombed. We find ourselves concerned with an actor, a porn star, and twin brothers who are all seemingly tied together in a strange and confusing way. Oh yeah, and Christopher Lambert (Highlander kids) is an arms dealer who sells guns out of his ice cream truck. Yeah, I know.
Honestly, I don’t know if the film is even remotely decipherable. For me, that was pretty irrelevant. Kelly is trying to follow Lynch in ways, granted not with as much “artistry” (or maybe just a different breed), but with some of the same intent and open-ended interpretations. First and foremost, for me, ST was a comedy. With so many cameos and the sheer insanity of the performances, I was laughing all over the place. Sure some of the funnier parts may have not been trying to be hilarious, but that made it even better. When I wasn’t asking myself, “WTF?” I was just enjoying the ride. Kelly has created something that has a lot of potential, and certainly to him, must make sense, somewhere, somehow. The idea of the story is enough for me to fill in the gaps, to buffer what I am given to somewhat make sense of it all. If some things were tweaked here and there, I’d see audiences embracing the story with more ease. But Kelly seems to push his audiences between a rock and a hard place, almost forcing you to hate it in many respects. I can’t tell if it’s just a complete train wreck, or just one that is so gnarly and completely awe-inspiringly awry that it becomes a beautiful tragedy.
This will certainly not be for everyone, and to some/many, will seem horrendously absurd and painfully awful. It made an impression on me, and although I don’t think it was much more beyond the experience/confusion/self-destruction of it all, it’s more than some films have given me recently, which says a lot. It’s hard not to compare it to Inland Empire, but the two are quite different. I am going to watch it again next week, if it makes even an nth of a degree of more sense, it’ll be worth it.